2/2004: Flexicurity: conceptual issues and political implementation in Europe

issn
1024-2589
publisher
ETUI-REHS
pages

Description

In recent years flexibility has been one of the keywords in political and academic debates on the future of work. This emphasis on flexibility has all too often been to the detriment of the security of employees and people without paid work. On the other hand, increased flexibility of working hours and working life may be desired by those who wish to combine work with other priorities and activities such as caring for children or elderly relatives. The concept of 'flexicurity' aims to allow for the coexistence of both flexibility and security in the world of work.

The various contributors to this issue propose definitions of 'flexicurity' and policy options for implementing flexicurity, in its differing guises, which range from the optimistic to the cautious. Inter alia, they assess two approaches often put forward as ways of implementing the concept of flexicurity in the context of European welfare states, the 'transitional labour market' approach and the 'professional status' approach, and examine the potential for flexicurity of the 'capability approach' developed by Amartya Sen. Specific attention is given to people's needs for different types of flexibility and security at different stages of their life. To illustrate flexicurity policies in Europe, four country studies are included: two from countries where flexicurity policies have been considered successful (the Netherlands and Denmark) and two where flexicurity still has to be developed (Germany and Spain).

Coordinators

Ute Klammer

(Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI) at the Hans-Böckler-Foundation).

Table of contents

Non-subscribers can download the editorial and one of the main articles for free.

Editorial

Main articles

News and background

Book reviews

Reports

Last modified: 7 Oct 2005
EN